🥳 Yay, our chicken is officially corn & soy free! No GMOs and better fats.
Been sitting on this one for a while. Truth is, we switched our birds over to corn and soy free feed when our first meat chickens went on pasture this past spring. But we still had older GMO-free chicken in the freezers... and it didn't feel right to announce something we couldn't actually hand you yet. So we waited. Sold through the old inventory. Kept quiet about it. That part's done, and we're excited to announce that: Every chicken we've got now is corn and soy free. What they're eating An organically grown blend of peas, wheat, canola oil, fishmeal, aragonite, grit, molasses, vitamins, minerals, and probiotics. NO corn. NO soy. And now you might be wondering, why? Why is this important? Well it all started when our amazing customers started requesting it. And, after doing our own research, we felt it was definitely a worthwhile endeavor. Let's dive into some reasons why: First, the GMO thing Here's where things actually stand in this country. USDA numbers for 2025: 94% of corn acres planted are biotech varieties. 96% of soybean acres are planted with herbicide resistant seed. That's not most of it... that's basically all of it. And on the chicken side, certified organic is less than 1% of US chicken production. Under one percent. Everything else is eating conventional grain, which means it's eating GMO corn and GMO soy. So when you buy chicken at the store (or get it served to you at a restaurant), you're not really making a choice about GMOs. That choice got made for you at the feed mill. Why does it matter? I'll be straight with you. Nobody has run a fifty year study feeding this stuff to families and watching what happens. That study doesn't exist. What we have is about thirty years of everybody eating it and finding out together. And it's not as easy as you fall and break your leg. That's a clear cause and effect. Any negative effects of eating GMOs are more nuanced. I'm talking underlying, chronic issues developing over many many years. And here's the part that bothers me most. These crops weren't engineered to be more nutritious. Most of them were engineered to survive being sprayed. That's the actual purpose (oh, and making cheaper food). Which means the GMO question and the chemical question were never really two separate questions. Even organic corn isn't a clean answer, by the way. Corn cross-pollinates. Pollen blows. Organic fields sit right next to GMO fields across the whole Midwest, and drift is just part of the deal out there. We're not in that conversation at all anymore. You can't cross-pollinate corn into a pea. The allergy piece, and why it's so hard on you Let me say the quiet part first. Soy allergy, the diagnosed kind, is not that common. Around 0.4% of kids. True corn allergy is rarer still, somewhere well under 1%. But those numbers are almost beside the point, because nobody is counting the people I actually hear from. Corn or soy intolerance has no test. There's no blood panel, no scratch test, no code a doctor can write down. Which means it doesn't show up in anyone's statistics. About 17% of people say some food is causing them problems, and the medical system confirms maybe 1% of that with a formal challenge. You can read that gap however you want. What I know is that a whole lot of people are out there sorting this out alone, by elimination, with no label to help them and no number to point to when somebody tells them it's in their head. And the system is not built to help them: Corn isn't a labeled allergen. Not one of the big nine. So there is no legal requirement anywhere to tell you corn is in something. You're reading ingredient lists hunting for maltodextrin, citric acid, dextrose, "natural flavors," modified food starch, and about forty other things that are corn wearing a different hat. Nobody is helping you. And refined soybean oil is exempt from soy labeling. The FDA doesn't require it declared as an allergen. So a product can contain soybean oil and say nothing about soy on the label at all. That's the part that makes people crazy. It isn't that the allergy is exotic. It's that the system genuinely is not built to help you find this stuff, and you're doing it anyway, in the grocery aisle, with kids in the cart. Then there's the layer underneath. We hear from customers who react to chicken from birds that were fed corn and soy. Not to corn on the cob. To the chicken. They're sensitive enough that whatever comes through the animal is enough to set them off. I don't have a lab study for that and I'm not going to pretend I do. But we've heard it from enough people to take it seriously. If that's you, or that's your kid, you already know how few things you can just say yes to. You can say yes to this. Glyphosate, and why we care Here's the connection most folks miss. Roundup Ready crops were engineered specifically to survive glyphosate. So the more of those crops got planted, the more glyphosate got sprayed. US glyphosate use went up roughly sixteen fold between 1992 and 2009. That climb tracks the GMO rollout almost exactly. That's why we treat "no GMOs" and "no glyphosate" as one thing instead of two. So what's actually wrong with it? In 2015 the World Health Organization's cancer agency (IARC) classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. They based that on sufficient evidence of cancer in animals, limited evidence in humans pointing mostly at non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and strong evidence that it damages DNA and drives oxidative stress. Now, plenty of regulators disagree. The EPA and others have looked at the same research and come to different conclusions. This is a real fight among serious people and I'm not going to stand here and tell you it's settled. But think about what's being argued over. The question on the table is whether the most sprayed chemical in the world probably causes cancer. That's the debate. Not whether it's good for you. Whether it probably causes cancer. I don't need that argument resolved to make a decision for my family. Our feed is organically grown, so glyphosate isn't coming in the front door. And cutting corn and soy removes the two crops it gets used on most heavily. It also gets sprayed on some conventional grains as a pre-harvest dry-down, wheat and oats and peas and canola included, which is exactly why the organic and local sourcing matters as much as the corn and soy part does. The omega 6 to 3 ratio A bird's fat ends up looking like whatever the bird ate. That's not a theory, it's just how these animals work. Feed corn and soy, and you get an animal loaded with way more omega 6s than omega 3s. Omega 6 and omega 3 are both fats you need. What matters is the balance, because they compete for the same enzymes and the same spots in your cells. Whichever one you eat more of wins. The typical American diet runs about 16 to 1. Before industrial food, people ate closer to 1 to 1. That gap does real damage over time. Dr. Artemis Simopoulos has spent decades linking a high ratio to cardiovascular disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. In her research, rheumatoid arthritis patients saw inflammation drop at 2 or 3 to 1. Asthma patients did better at 5 to 1 and worse at 10 to 1. And it's slow. Omega 6 parks in your tissue and stays there for years, which means what you feed your kids now is arithmetic that shows up decades from now. So what does pulling corn and soy actually do? A farm in Minnesota got grant funding and tested it properly. Two sets of pastured chickens side by side, same grass, same hoop houses moved to fresh ground every day. The only difference was the feed. The corn and soy birds came back at 11 to 1. The corn and soy free birds came back at 1.3 to 1. Same sunshine, same pasture. All of that difference came out of the bucket. Now the part nobody mentions. Taking corn and soy out is only half the job. Plenty of feed sold as corn and soy free just swaps in other high omega 6 ingredients and lands right back where it started. The ration has to be built on purpose. Ours runs on peas and wheat, low fat to begin with, with fishmeal for the omega 3 side. Bring the six down, bring the three up. We haven't tested our own birds yet. My guess is we land somewhere between 1 to 1 and 4 to 1, but that's a guess and I'll call it one. When we test, you'll get the number either way. You've probably already thrown out the seed oils in your kitchen. This is that same fight, one step further back. Because those oils don't only show up in a bottle on the shelf. They show up in the animals. Why there's no flax in the feed Flax is the obvious shortcut for omega-3s. Plenty of good farms use it. We decided against it, for two reasons. The first is conversion. Flax gives you ALA. Your body has to convert ALA into EPA and DHA before it can really do anything with it, and that conversion is poor in people and in birds both. Fishmeal skips the middleman. It brings EPA and DHA already made, in the form your body is actually looking for. A chicken fed flax reads well on a label. A chicken fed fishmeal delivers the thing the label is pointing at. The second is hormones. Flax is the richest source of lignans of any food on earth, by a wide margin, and lignans are phytoestrogens. Plant compounds that act on estrogen receptors in your body. Mainstream nutrition mostly treats that as a benefit. The Weston A. Price Foundation and others have long argued the opposite, that loading a developing body with plant compounds that mimic hormones is not something to do casually, especially for kids and especially for anyone already dealing with hormone trouble. We're not going to settle that argument in a blog post. But we don't have to. Here's our rule for the feed: if something is hormonally active and we don't strictly need it, it doesn't go in. We already have a better omega-3 source. So flax has no job here. We're not trying to engineer a supplement. We're trying to feed a bird something close to what a bird ought to eat, and let your body do the rest. About the canola oil Somebody's going to ask, so let me get out in front of it. Yes, there's canola oil in the ration. It's organically grown, and it's a small piece of the overall feed. Birds need some fat. They need energy. The question is which fat. Canola runs roughly half the polyunsaturated fat of soybean oil and carries a much better omega 6 to 3 balance. At our scale, it's the best option on the table right now. If a better option shows up, we'll change with it. And we'll tell you when we do. What this actually means for your family You already read labels. You already ask the questions most people never think to ask. You've probably had that moment where you find something that looks clean, dig one layer deeper, and find out it wasn't. That's an exhausting way to feed a family, and most people around you have no idea you're doing it. This is us digging that layer for you, before you have to ask. No GMOs. No glyphosate. Nothing in the feed for a sensitive kid to react to. No added phytoestrogens. And a fat profile we're proud of. Same birds. Same pasture. Same families raising them. Just better feed. Y'all asked for this for a long time. Thanks for pushing.
