🦃 Thanksgiving turkey deposits are available now! CLAIM YOUR TURKEY.

Why our milk costs more than others. It's the care of raising the cows.

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

October 22, 2026

cows-pasture-moving.jpg

We get this question a lot, and honestly, it's a good one.

"But why does it cost MORE if you don't need to buy in feed? The cows are eating what's already growing."

Valid question. On paper it sounds like grass-fed milk should be the cheap stuff. Grass grows for free. The cows harvest it themselves. What's left to pay for?

You'd figure it would be simple. It's not.

The short answer is this: our dairy farms aren't built to make the cheapest milk. They're built for the happiest cows and the healthiest milk. And it turns out that takes a lot more time, a lot more land, and a lot more hands than the other way.

Here's where the money actually goes.

Grass isn't free. Good grass takes work.

This is the biggest one, and it's the part nobody sees.

On most dairy farms, cows live in a barn. Maybe they get moved from one pen to another. Feed comes to them on a truck, gets dumped in a bunk, and the cows eat. It's efficient. It's predictable. And it's built to move a lot of milk with as few people as possible.

Our cows go to the feed instead. And we move them to fresh pasture every single day.

And that's all they eat. No grain, ever. No corn or soy, ever. No GMOs, ever. Not a scoop in the parlor, not a top-up in winter.

That means somebody is out there walking the acres. Checking how tall the grass is. Deciding which paddock is ready and which one needs more rest. Then taking down fence, setting up new fence, making sure there's water where the cows are headed, and walking the herd over.

Every day. Rain, heat, mud, all of it.

Why go to that trouble? Because this is what regenerative grazing actually looks like. The cows graze one patch hard, leave their manure behind, and move on. That patch gets weeks to rest and regrow before they come back. The soil gets fed. The grass comes back thicker. The cows get fresh, green forage every morning instead of whatever's left in a stall.

Leave cows in one spot and they'll eat their favorite plants down to the dirt and ignore the rest. Move them every day and you get healthier pasture, healthier cows, and better milk.

But "move them every day" is a real job. It's hours of labor, every day of the grazing season, that a confinement dairy simply doesn't have on the books.

Then there's hay. Lots of hay.

Cows still have to eat when the grass stops growing. In Pennsylvania, that's a good chunk of the year.

So all summer long, while the cows are getting moved every day, there's a second job going on: making hay. Cutting it. Letting it dry. Raking, baling, hauling, stacking. And every bit of it depends on the weather. One rain at the wrong time can ruin a cutting that took days of work.

We always try to make all the hay we need for winter ourselves. But some years the weather doesn't cooperate, and we have to buy in.

When we do, we don't just grab whatever's cheapest. We buy high-quality hay that's been tested, so we know exactly what the cows are getting. Good hay costs more.

So "they eat what's already growing" is only half the story. The other half is stacked in the barn, and somebody worked hard for every bale.

Grass-fed cows give less milk. A lot less.

Here's the part that surprises people.

The average American dairy cow produced about 24,390 pounds of milk in 2025, according to the USDA. That's over 2,800 gallons a year from one cow. She gets there on a carefully engineered ration of corn, soy, and silage designed for one thing: maximum output.

Grass doesn't push a cow that hard. And we don't want it to.

In one three-year study published in the Journal of Dairy Science, Holsteins fed a high-concentrate ration indoors averaged about 9,300 kg of milk per lactation. Holsteins on a mostly grazed system averaged about 6,500 kg. That's roughly 30% less milk from the same breed of cow.

On our farms, how much a cow gives varies a lot, cow to cow and depending on whether she's nursing a calf. But across the board, every cow is eating, getting milked, and getting cared for... and putting less in the tank than a confinement cow down the road. Same work per cow. Fewer gallons to spread the cost over.

Real regenerative pasture takes more land

Here's something a label won't tell you. True regenerative grazing takes a lot more land than keeping cows in a barn.

Why? Because the land needs rest. After the herd grazes a paddock, that ground gets weeks to recover before the cows come back. The grass regrows. The roots go deeper. The soil builds. That only works if there are enough acres to keep the herd moving onto fresh ground while everything else rests.

Researchers comparing grassland dairies found that milk per acre drops when you farm this way, because you can't pack as many cows onto the same land. More land per gallon means more cost per gallon. Taxes, fencing, water lines, upkeep.

Sure, you can find milk at the store that says "pasture raised." But that label doesn't tell you much. It doesn't promise the pasture is any good. It doesn't promise the cows get moved. And it doesn't promise the soil, the plants, and the animals are getting better year over year.

That's the standard we hold ourselves to. And it takes room.

The calves get their share first... and that's especially true on our dairy farms

This is one of the things we're proudest of, and it's rare.

On almost every dairy farm in the country, the calf is taken from its mother within the first day. From then on she's fed by a person, from a bucket or a bottle, and every drop her mother makes goes in the tank. That's the industry standard.

On our dairy farms, the calves stay with their mothers. They live alongside her, go out to pasture with her, and nurse whenever they're hungry (eight or ten times a day). The only time they're apart is the half hour at milking, morning and evening.

And a calf on a cow drinks nearly everything she makes. What's left for the milking machine is the leftovers. As one of our dairymen put it: not much... but every drop counts.

We also let our heifers grow up before they start working. Conventional dairies aim to have a heifer freshen (have her first calf and start milking) at about 22 months. Ours go at around 30. That's eight extra months of feeding and caring for an animal that isn't producing anything yet.

Neither of those choices shows up well on a spreadsheet. Both of them show up in the price.

We wrote all about it here if you want the full story: Calves. The natural way we do it VS what most other farms do.

Small farms don't get bulk pricing

Our dairies are family farms, not thousand-cow operations. And in dairy, size changes everything.

A big dairy buys feed by the trainload. Its milking parlor handles dozens of cows at a time. Every fixed cost (buildings, equipment, repairs, testing, labor) gets spread across millions of gallons.

A small herd can't do that. Plenty of costs don't shrink just because there are fewer cows. A lab test costs the same whether it covers milk from 20 cows or 2,000. A bulk tank still has to be bought, cleaned, and kept cold. Someone still has to show up for every milking, twice a day, every day of the year.

So every bottle, every jar, every hour of labor gets divided by far fewer gallons.

And honestly? We want it that way. We want our farms small.

When a family manages its own land and animals, they build the kind of connection with nature and with each cow that makes all the difference. They notice when one cow is off her feed. They know which paddock needs more rest. You can't say that about a mega dairy run by a hired crew. The connection simply isn't the same.

So it's not inefficiency. It's the real cost of buying from a family farm instead of a milk factory.

Raw milk takes more care. A lot more.

Here's the part most people never think about.

Conventional milk gets heated before it's sold. Pasteurization kills whatever made it into the tank. So the system can tolerate a lot.

Take somatic cells. They're mostly white blood cells (the same stuff pus is made of), and they climb when a cow has an infection in her udder. The legal limit for Grade A milk in the US is 750,000 somatic cells per milliliter. The European Union caps it at 400,000. Plenty of US farms run well below the limit. But the limit tells you what the system is willing to accept, because the heat is there to clean up after it.

Raw milk doesn't get that safety net. No pasteurizer is going to cover for a sick cow or a dirty barn. What comes out of the cow is what ends up in your glass.

So for raw milk, the cows have to be truly healthy. All of them, all the time. And they get there without drugs. No antibiotics to knock down an infection. No hormones to push production. Just good pasture, fresh air, room to move, and farmers who know their cows well enough to catch a problem early.

That means extra time at every single milking: prepping and cleaning each cow before she's milked, keeping the equipment spotless, and chilling the milk fast. Then testing it regularly to make sure it's what we say it is.

It also means some milk doesn't make the cut. If a cow has something going on (healing from an injury, a high somatic cell count), her milk stays out of the tank until she's right again.

Careful costs more than fast. With raw milk, careful is the only option.

You can read more about how we handle it on our Milk Quality & Safety page.

Store milk isn't cheap. It's artificially cheap.

So why is the gallon at the grocery store so much less?

Part of it is everything above. Those cows give more milk, live in less space, and need fewer people per gallon.

But a big part of it is what they eat. Conventional dairy cows run on corn and soy. And corn and soy are the two most subsidized crops in the country. In 2024, corn alone got $3.2 billion in federal farm subsidies, and soybeans got another $1.9 billion. Together that's almost half of all federal farm subsidies.

This has been going on a long time. Researchers at Tufts found that for nine years after the 1996 Farm Bill, corn sold for about 23% below what it cost to grow, and soybeans about 15% below. Taxpayers covered the gap. Big livestock operations got cheap feed.

And nearly all of that corn and soy is GMO. USDA puts it at 94% of corn acres and 96% of soybean acres in 2025, as we covered when our chicken went corn and soy free.

So the price on that gallon isn't the whole price. Some of it you already paid, on your tax bill. It just never showed up at the register.

Cheaper now, or cheaper later?

Here's the question we keep coming back to.

What's cheaper today isn't always what's cheaper in the long run.

According to the CDC, about 6 in 10 American adults live with at least one chronic disease. And roughly 90% of the country's health care spending goes to people living with chronic and mental health conditions. Food isn't the only reason for that. But nobody seriously argues it isn't part of it.

And it's not only our health. It's the soil.

Grow corn and soy on the same ground year after year and the soil wears out. So those farms lean on synthetic fertilizer, made in factories and hauled in by truck, train, and barge. Think about the cost of shipping all that fertilizer, every single season. Then add the herbicides and pesticides it takes to keep those fields going.

Not all of it stays on the field. Fertilizer washing off farms in the upper Mississippi basin runs down the river and creates a "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico every summer, where the water has too little oxygen for sea life. Billions of dollars have been spent since 1997 trying to shrink it.

That's a bill too. We'll all be paying it for a long time. It just never shows up on the milk jug.

Our pastures work the other way. No synthetic fertilizers. No sprays. Ever. The cows spread their own manure as they graze, and the rest days give the ground time to rebuild. Every year the soil should be a little better than the year before, not a little more used up.

We're not going to tell you a gallon of milk will keep you out of the doctor's office. We can't promise that, and we won't.

What we can tell you is what's in your glass. Milk from cows who lived on pasture, ate fresh grass every day, raised their own calves, and never touched GMO corn or soy. Milk from a family farm we know by name.

So the next time you see the price on our milk, ask yourself: by eating cheaply now, will I pay more for it later?

We think the real food is worth it. Not because it's a luxury. Because it's what food is supposed to be.

Thanks for supporting the farmers who do it the slow way.

Sources

More from the blog

Low Histamine Beef and Raw Milk. Why Is This Important?

We just added three new things to the store this year: low histamine ground beef, low histamine raw milk, and low histamine raw cream. If you've never heard of histamine intolerance, these probably aren't for you (and that's totally fine). But if you have, you already know how hard it is to find meat and dairy that doesn't leave you feeling awful. So here's what histamine intolerance is, who's dealing with it, and exactly how we're handling these products differently. First, what is histamine? Histamine is a compound your body makes on its own. It helps with immune response, digestion, and even brain signaling. It's also in food. Normally that's no problem. An enzyme in your gut called DAO (diamine oxidase) breaks down the histamine you eat before it gets into your bloodstream. Histamine intolerance is what happens when that system can't keep up. Either DAO is low, or something is blocking it, and histamine builds up faster than your body can clear it. Researchers compare it to lactose intolerance. It's not an allergy... it's more like a bucket that overflows. When the bucket overflows, symptoms can show up almost anywhere: Headaches or migrainesFlushing, itching, or hivesBloating, cramping, or diarrheaStuffy or runny noseRacing heart That spread is part of what makes it so hard to pin down. There's no single reliable test. Doctors usually look for symptoms in two or more parts of the body that get better when histamine-heavy foods come out of the diet. Why a low histamine diet matters Here's the thing most people don't realize. Fresh meat and fresh milk contain very little histamine. Histamine builds up over time, as bacteria convert an amino acid called histidine into histamine. The longer food sits, the more histamine it has. That's why the usual problem foods are aged, fermented, or stored: Aged cheese, yogurt, kefirCured meats like salami and baconAged beef (which is nearly all beef... more on that below)Wine and beerLeftovers (yes, even in the fridge) And cooking doesn't fix it. Histamine holds up to heat, so once it's in the food, it stays. The only real answer is freshness. A low histamine diet lowers how much is going into the bucket. Recent research reviews report that many people see digestive, skin, and headache symptoms improve within a few weeks, and there's early evidence it may even help DAO levels recover. It's a restrictive way to eat though, so it's worth working with a practitioner who knows this stuff. Why are more people dealing with this? Honest answer: nobody knows for sure if histamine intolerance is becoming more common or just finally getting recognized. Estimates usually land around 1 to 3% of people, and researchers think the real number is probably higher. What we do know is that interest has grown a lot over the last decade, among both doctors and researchers. A few things seem to be pushing more people over the edge: Gut health. DAO is made in the lining of your gut. When that lining is inflamed or the gut bacteria are out of balance, DAO takes a hit. Some studies have even found more histamine-producing bacteria in the guts of people with histamine intolerance.Medications. Some common drugs can block DAO, including certain antibiotics and acid reducers.Alcohol. It's a double whammy. Wine and beer are high in histamine, and alcohol also slows DAO down.Genetics. Variations in the gene that makes DAO are surprisingly common, so some people start out with less room in the bucket.Long COVID. A lot of people with long COVID report brand new food reactions they never had before. It's been tied to mast cells (more on those below), though the research on diet here is still thin. Other conditions that can make low histamine important Histamine intolerance isn't the only reason someone might be looking for low histamine food. Here are a few others: Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). Mast cells are immune cells that store histamine. With MCAS, they release it too easily. A low histamine diet is one of the most common things people with MCAS try, even though official guidelines don't prescribe a specific diet.Mastocytosis. A rarer condition where the body has too many mast cells. Patient resources specifically warn about leftovers as a trigger.Long COVID, POTS, ME/CFS, and fibromyalgia. These often overlap with MCAS, and many people in these communities use low histamine eating to manage symptoms.Hormone shifts. Histamine intolerance shows up more often in women, especially in midlife. Estrogen and histamine seem to influence each other, which may be why some women notice symptoms or migraines around their cycle or during perimenopause.Gut conditions. IBS, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and unexplained digestive trouble can all overlap with poor histamine breakdown.Migraines. Histamine affects blood vessels and nerves, and it's a known trigger for some people who get migraines. Why we decided to offer this Here's what gets us. DAO is made in your gut, so histamine intolerance is closely tied to gut health. And for a lot of people working on their gut, nourishing whole foods like good beef and raw dairy are a big part of the plan. But those are exactly the foods that get hard to eat with histamine intolerance. Nearly all beef is aged. Raw milk keeps culturing as it sits. Finding either one fresh enough is nearly impossible in today's food world. So we thought... why not offer it? How we make it low histamine Since histamine is all about time, our whole approach is about cutting time out. Low histamine ground beef: The cow is harvested, the beef is ground, and it's frozen... all on the same day. No aging. It's standard practice to let beef hang (or age) for 2 to 3 weeks after harvest. That's how beef gets tender. Natural enzymes in the meat slowly break down the muscle, and honestly, you wouldn't want to eat a steak right after harvest. But while the beef hangs, bacteria are working too, turning histidine into histamine. So the same aging that makes beef tender is what makes it high in histamine. That's true for nearly all beef you buy, not just fancy dry-aged steaks. That's why we can't do this with steaks or roasts. Without aging, they'd be tough, and we're not going to sell you a tough steak. Ground beef is different. Grinding takes care of tenderness, so aging isn't needed. That makes ground beef the one cut where we can skip aging entirely and still give you something great to eat. Low histamine raw milk: This comes from Leon's farm. The cows are milked, and the milk is cooled, bottled, and frozen. All the same day. Low histamine raw cream: Same as the milk, except the cream is also separated that same day before it's bottled and frozen. Why freeze it? Our regular raw milk shows up fresh and sweet, then slowly cultures over time. That's what real raw milk does, and most of you love it that way. But culturing is bacteria at work, and that's exactly what someone with histamine intolerance needs to avoid. Freezing stops the clock right where it started. If you don't need low histamine, stick with our regular fresh milk. It's what most of our customers prefer. A few honest notes "Low histamine" describes how we handle these products. We haven't lab-tested histamine levels. We're just doing everything we can to keep them as fresh as possible.Everyone's threshold is different. What works for one person might not work for another, especially for folks with MCAS.Our yogurt and kefir aren't low histamine. They're fermented, which is what makes them so good for a lot of people. Just not this group.This isn't medical advice. If you're managing a health condition, talk with your provider about whether raw dairy is right for you. Tips once it arrives It arrives frozen. We ship it frozen, and pickup orders are delivered frozen too. The goal is to keep it frozen all the way to you, so pop it straight into the freezer.Ground beef: cook it from frozen. A lot of folks with histamine intolerance skip thawing altogether, and ground beef works great that way.Milk and cream: use within 1 to 2 days of thawing. Every body is different, so some people can go a few days longer. Start there and see how you feel.Freeze leftovers right away instead of keeping them in the fridge. If low histamine eating has made meat and dairy feel off-limits, we hope this helps. We'd love to hear how it goes for you. You can send us a note here. Shop our low histamine foods Low histamine ground beef (unaged and frozen right after grinding)Low histamine raw milk (milked, cooled, bottled, and frozen in one day)Low histamine raw cream (milked, separated, and frozen the same day)Pastured turkey (harvested and frozen the same day) Further reading From the research: Histamine Intolerance: The Current State of the ArtEvidence for Dietary Management of Histamine IntoleranceHistamine Intolerance Originates in the GutIntestinal Dysbiosis in Patients with Histamine Intolerance From traditional food and natural health voices: Hidden in Plain Sight: Histamine Problems (Weston A. Price Foundation)A WWE Wrestler Turned Farmer Finds Healing With Sarah Rowe (Wise Traditions podcast)Headaches, Hives and Heartburn: Could Histamine Be the Cause? (Chris Kresser)Got Allergies? Your Microbes Could Be Responsible (Chris Kresser)Low Histamine Meat Tips and Common Mistakes (Mast Cell 360)

Calves. The natural way we do it VS what most other farms do.

I went out to Leon's a few weeks ago. Leon is one of our two dairy farmers. His herd supplies the raw milk for all of our raw yogurt and raw kefir (his wife Annie makes it by hand, in small batches, right there on the farm) plus some of our fluid milk. Our other dairyman is Elmer, not far away, and he supplies nearly all the fluid milk along with the cream and butter. Elmer runs Jerseys, which give that high-butterfat milk you want if you're making cream. I do marketing for Prairie Foods. But I also homestead, and I've been deep in the real food world for years, so I show up at these farms already knowing a fair amount about what I'm looking at. Which is exactly why I ask so many questions. The things I know are things you deserve to know too. That's most of my job as I understand it. I showed up around milking time. We walked down into the pastures to bring the herd up, which I'd do nearly every day of my life if somebody would let me. I don't know how to tell you about Leon's place without sounding like I'm exaggerating. Lush green pasture rolling out in every direction. Dirt paths winding down through it. The whole thing looks like somebody painted it. If you closed your eyes right now and pictured a regenerative dairy farm, the way it's supposed to look, you'd be picturing something close to Leon's. And out in the middle of it, cows everywhere, and calves mixed in, and the calves are with their mothers because on this farm that's just where calves are. Then we started them toward the barn, and that's where it got complicated. The cows go in. The calves are not invited. But nobody's explained this to the calves, so they come right along with their mamas… like of course they're going in too, and Leon and his two sons have to head them off. Some get turned back at the door. Some slip in anyway and have to be walked back out. It's thirty minutes. That's all milking takes. The calves wait outside and the second the gate opens everybody's back together. While this was going on I asked Leon how much milk they even get from a cow who's been nursing a calf all day. Not much, he said. The calf takes nearly all of it. But every drop counts. Side note: I followed up on the phone with Leon after the visit to get even more info about this. I stood there a minute with that. A man and his two teenage boys, sorting calves out of a barn twice a day, for whatever the calf left behind. That's the whole story really. Everything below is just the details. The one thing that makes all the difference I want to say this plainly before anything else, because everything else comes back to it. On Leon's farm, the calves stay with their mothers. They nurse from her, live alongside her, go out to pasture with her. Apart from that half hour at milking every morning and every evening. On almost every other dairy farm, they don't. The calf is taken from its mother within the first day and fed by a person, out of a bucket or a bottle, twice a day. That's the difference. One sentence. It sounds small written down. It isn't. Why nearly everyone does it the other way I'm not writing this to make anyone a villain. There aren't any villains here. This is just how the dairy business works, and I understand why. The biggest reason is straightforward: milk. A calf on a cow drinks nearly all of what she makes. That's what Leon was telling me at the barn door. Whatever's left for the machine is the leftovers. Take the calf away and every bit of that milk goes in the tank instead. Not a little more. Almost all of it. On an operation with a loan payment and a milk check, that difference decides things. There are other honest reasons too. You can measure exactly how much colostrum each calf got instead of hoping. Disease doesn't move from cow to calf as easily. You catch a sick calf sooner because you're handling every one of them twice a day. Those are real arguments made by real farmers who care about their animals. But once that first decision is made, a lot of other things follow from it. Some of them are hard. The part that's hard to read A dairy cow has to have a calf in order to give milk. That isn't a policy, it's biology. But the farm doesn't need most of those calves. It only needs enough heifers to replace the cows aging out of the milking herd. Everything else, most of the bull calves and a fair share of the heifers, is what the industry itself calls ā€œsurplusā€. Leon's been in dairy a long time and knows a lot of people in it. He'll tell you straight: plenty of farms put those calves down, or run them to the sale barn at a few days or weeks old and never think about them again. It isn't cruelty. It's that on that kind of operation, a calf who will never fill a milk tank isn't an animal to look after. It's a line item that isn't earning. I understand the math. I do. It's just not how Leon does it. The calves who get sold usually end up in veal. And here's a piece of it most people outside the industry never hear. Veal calves aren't fed milk. They're fed milk replacer. It's a powder you mix with warm water, made mostly of dried whey and whey protein concentrate with fat blended in. One formula patented for veal specifically calls for a fat portion that's 65 to 89 percent partially hydrogenated soybean oil, plus some coconut oil and lecithin. Partially hydrogenated soybean oil. Fed to a baby cow. If you've spent any time reading labels you already know exactly what to think about that. Yuck! And the iron is deliberately kept low. Not to save money. Low iron is how you get the pale color the veal market pays for. The calf gets nothing solid, so his rumen (the stomach a cow is supposed to have) never develops at all. The results are about what you'd guess. Research on calves fed low-iron replacer found them anemic, growing slower, and running into more infections, more fever, and more antibiotic treatment than calves who got enough iron. I'm not telling you this to be grim. I'm telling you because it sits somewhere in the supply chain behind a gallon of milk at the store, and almost nobody mentions it. What Leon does Right now, every calf on Leon's farm is raised by its own mother. That's it. That's the system. It's why the barn was such a scene the day I was there. But he's working toward something else on top of it, and this is the part I found clever. It’s a way to take the best care of the calves while also keeping milk costs down for you. Nurse cows. The idea is that one cow can raise about four calves. So when you've got a group of calves born close together (Leon expects a batch like that in the spring), you pick a cow for the job and put four of them on her. How do you pick her? Usually she's a cow who's got something going on. Healing from a thorn in her hoof. High somatic cell count. Some issue that means her milk shouldn't be going in the tank right now anyway, or that she'd be better off out of the milking string for a while. Instead of that cow being a problem, she's got a job. And four calves get raised by a cow instead of a bucket. Then it mostly runs itself. They nurse when they're hungry and quit when they're done. No hauling them into the barn twice a day. The whole outfit goes out on grass together. What he needs for it is dedicated space. A box stall ready before the calves come, and he's been thinking about putting up a greenhouse with deep bedding and gates so there's real room to work. And somewhere to graze, which is where his brother-in-law's farm comes in. Nurse cows and calves out there together all summer would be beautiful.  Leon calls the older calves the biggest babies in town. Having seen them, that's accurate. They're enormous and still nursing like they're a week old. Why on-demand matters more than I realized I asked whether it truly makes a difference, since a bottle-fed calf still gets its milk. He said go stand in a calf barn after feeding sometime. The calves finish in about ninety seconds and then they don't stop. They keep working a nipple that's already dry. They chew on the bars. They suck each other's ears and tails. Some of them just suck air. They're not hungry. They got the milk. That's what makes it strange to watch. Drinking and sucking are two separate needs, and a bucket only answers one. The drive has to go somewhere, so it goes into the gate. You don't see it in calves on a cow. Not because they're better behaved. Because they nurse eight or ten times a day, on their own schedule, until they're actually finished. Nothing is left undone. Leon takes eight months longer Conventional dairies aim to have a heifer freshen (have her first calf and start milking) at 22 months. That's the industry target and there's serious money attached to hitting it. Leon's go 30. Eight extra months of feeding an animal that isn't earning anything yet. On paper it's probably a bad decision and he knows it. He says let her grow up before you ask her to work, and the paper may look different later. What the research says, and what it doesn't I want to be honest about this part. Leon believes a calf raised on a cow becomes a better cow. Sounder, longer-lasting, less trouble. That's what he's watched over years of doing it, and it's what he hears from other farmers doing the same. The published research is mixed. Some studies find the advantage holds, some find it's gone by six months, and at least one followed those calves into their first lactation and found no difference. Two things worth saying about that. First, look at what those studies measured. Milk yield. Culling rates. Growth curves. That's the industry's own scorecard, built around the 22-month question. Nobody has run a study on whether a calf got to be a calf, because that isn't a number you can put in a column. Second, a question I can't answer. A lot of agricultural research gets funded by people with something riding on the outcome. I don't know who paid for these particular studies and I'm not going to sit here and tell you they were bought. But it's fair to notice that "the current system is fine, actually" is a convenient finding for an industry with an enormous amount of money invested in the current system. Take that for what it's worth. I'd rather raise it than pretend it never crossed my mind. So no, we can't tell you science has proven Leon right about the grown cow. It hasn't. What isn't in dispute is the calf, right now. A calf on a cow eats when it's hungry, nurses until it's satisfied, stays with its mother, and doesn't spend the afternoon chewing a gate. That part isn't a theory. It's just what you see standing there. Why we're telling you this Most of you came to us because you were tired of guessing where your food came from. The dairy industry has some genuinely dirty corners. We're not going to pretend otherwise, and we're not going to act like Prairie Foods invented decency. What we can tell you is that we know our farmers, we've stood in their barns, and the way Leon raises calves is one of the reasons we love working with him. He does it the slow way, on his own dime, for reasons that may or may not show up on a spreadsheet. And twice a day he and his boys spend the first ten minutes of milking walking calves back out of a barn, because that's what it costs to do it this way. That's the farm your yogurt and kefir comes from.

🄳 Yay, our chicken is officially corn & soy free! No GMOs and better fats.

Been sitting on this one for a while. Truth is, we switched our birds over to corn and soy free feed when our first meat chickens went on pasture this past spring. But we still had older GMO-free chicken in the freezers... and it didn't feel right to announce something we couldn't actually hand you yet. So we waited. Sold through the old inventory. Kept quiet about it. That part's done, and we're excited to announce that: Every chicken we've got now is corn and soy free. What they're eating An organically grown blend of peas, wheat, canola oil, fishmeal, aragonite, grit, molasses, vitamins, minerals, and probiotics. NO corn. NO soy. And now you might be wondering, why? Why is this important? Well it all started when our amazing customers started requesting it. And, after doing our own research, we felt it was definitely a worthwhile endeavor. Let's dive into some reasons why: First, the GMO thing Here's where things actually stand in this country. USDA numbers for 2025: 94% of corn acres planted are biotech varieties. 96% of soybean acres are planted with herbicide resistant seed. That's not most of it... that's basically all of it. And on the chicken side, certified organic is less than 1% of US chicken production. Under one percent. Everything else is eating conventional grain, which means it's eating GMO corn and GMO soy. So when you buy chicken at the store (or get it served to you at a restaurant), you're not really making a choice about GMOs. That choice got made for you at the feed mill. Why does it matter? I'll be straight with you. Nobody has run a fifty year study feeding this stuff to families and watching what happens. That study doesn't exist. What we have is about thirty years of everybody eating it and finding out together. And it's not as easy as you fall and break your leg. That's a clear cause and effect. Any negative effects of eating GMOs are more nuanced. I'm talking underlying, chronic issues developing over many many years. And here's the part that bothers me most. These crops weren't engineered to be more nutritious. Most of them were engineered to survive being sprayed. That's the actual purpose (oh, and making cheaper food). Which means the GMO question and the chemical question were never really two separate questions. Even organic corn isn't a clean answer, by the way. Corn cross-pollinates. Pollen blows. Organic fields sit right next to GMO fields across the whole Midwest, and drift is just part of the deal out there. We're not in that conversation at all anymore. You can't cross-pollinate corn into a pea. The allergy piece, and why it's so hard on you Let me say the quiet part first. Soy allergy, the diagnosed kind, is not that common. Around 0.4% of kids. True corn allergy is rarer still, somewhere well under 1%.  But those numbers are almost beside the point, because nobody is counting the people I actually hear from. Corn or soy intolerance has no test. There's no blood panel, no scratch test, no code a doctor can write down. Which means it doesn't show up in anyone's statistics. About 17% of people say some food is causing them problems, and the medical system confirms maybe 1% of that with a formal challenge. You can read that gap however you want. What I know is that a whole lot of people are out there sorting this out alone, by elimination, with no label to help them and no number to point to when somebody tells them it's in their head. And the system is not built to help them: Corn isn't a labeled allergen. Not one of the big nine. So there is no legal requirement anywhere to tell you corn is in something. You're reading ingredient lists hunting for maltodextrin, citric acid, dextrose, "natural flavors," modified food starch, and about forty other things that are corn wearing a different hat. Nobody is helping you. And refined soybean oil is exempt from soy labeling. The FDA doesn't require it declared as an allergen. So a product can contain soybean oil and say nothing about soy on the label at all. That's the part that makes people crazy. It isn't that the allergy is exotic. It's that the system genuinely is not built to help you find this stuff, and you're doing it anyway, in the grocery aisle, with kids in the cart. Then there's the layer underneath. We hear from customers who react to chicken from birds that were fed corn and soy. Not to corn on the cob. To the chicken. They're sensitive enough that whatever comes through the animal is enough to set them off. I don't have a lab study for that and I'm not going to pretend I do. But we've heard it from enough people to take it seriously. If that's you, or that's your kid, you already know how few things you can just say yes to. You can say yes to this. Glyphosate, and why we care Here's the connection most folks miss. Roundup Ready crops were engineered specifically to survive glyphosate. So the more of those crops got planted, the more glyphosate got sprayed. US glyphosate use went up roughly sixteen fold between 1992 and 2009. That climb tracks the GMO rollout almost exactly. That's why we treat "no GMOs" and "no glyphosate" as one thing instead of two. So what's actually wrong with it? In 2015 the World Health Organization's cancer agency (IARC) classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. They based that on sufficient evidence of cancer in animals, limited evidence in humans pointing mostly at non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and strong evidence that it damages DNA and drives oxidative stress. Now, plenty of regulators disagree. The EPA and others have looked at the same research and come to different conclusions. This is a real fight among serious people and I'm not going to stand here and tell you it's settled. But think about what's being argued over. The question on the table is whether the most sprayed chemical in the world probably causes cancer. That's the debate. Not whether it's good for you. Whether it probably causes cancer. I don't need that argument resolved to make a decision for my family. Our feed is organically grown, so glyphosate isn't coming in the front door. And cutting corn and soy removes the two crops it gets used on most heavily. It also gets sprayed on some conventional grains as a pre-harvest dry-down, wheat and oats and peas and canola included, which is exactly why the organic and local sourcing matters as much as the corn and soy part does. The omega 6 to 3 ratio A bird's fat ends up looking like whatever the bird ate. That's not a theory, it's just how these animals work. Feed corn and soy, and you get an animal loaded with way more omega 6s than omega 3s. Omega 6 and omega 3 are both fats you need. What matters is the balance, because they compete for the same enzymes and the same spots in your cells. Whichever one you eat more of wins. The typical American diet runs about 16 to 1. Before industrial food, people ate closer to 1 to 1. That gap does real damage over time. Dr. Artemis Simopoulos has spent decades linking a high ratio to cardiovascular disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. In her research, rheumatoid arthritis patients saw inflammation drop at 2 or 3 to 1. Asthma patients did better at 5 to 1 and worse at 10 to 1. And it's slow. Omega 6 parks in your tissue and stays there for years, which means what you feed your kids now is arithmetic that shows up decades from now. So what does pulling corn and soy actually do? A farm in Minnesota got grant funding and tested it properly. Two sets of pastured chickens side by side, same grass, same hoop houses moved to fresh ground every day. The only difference was the feed. The corn and soy birds came back at 11 to 1. The corn and soy free birds came back at 1.3 to 1. Same sunshine, same pasture. All of that difference came out of the bucket. Now the part nobody mentions. Taking corn and soy out is only half the job. Plenty of feed sold as corn and soy free just swaps in other high omega 6 ingredients and lands right back where it started. The ration has to be built on purpose. Ours runs on peas and wheat, low fat to begin with, with fishmeal for the omega 3 side. Bring the six down, bring the three up. We haven't tested our own birds yet. My guess is we land somewhere between 1 to 1 and 4 to 1, but that's a guess and I'll call it one. When we test, you'll get the number either way. You've probably already thrown out the seed oils in your kitchen. This is that same fight, one step further back. Because those oils don't only show up in a bottle on the shelf. They show up in the animals. Why there's no flax in the feed Flax is the obvious shortcut for omega-3s. Plenty of good farms use it. We decided against it, for two reasons. The first is conversion. Flax gives you ALA. Your body has to convert ALA into EPA and DHA before it can really do anything with it, and that conversion is poor in people and in birds both. Fishmeal skips the middleman. It brings EPA and DHA already made, in the form your body is actually looking for. A chicken fed flax reads well on a label. A chicken fed fishmeal delivers the thing the label is pointing at. The second is hormones. Flax is the richest source of lignans of any food on earth, by a wide margin, and lignans are phytoestrogens. Plant compounds that act on estrogen receptors in your body. Mainstream nutrition mostly treats that as a benefit. The Weston A. Price Foundation and others have long argued the opposite, that loading a developing body with plant compounds that mimic hormones is not something to do casually, especially for kids and especially for anyone already dealing with hormone trouble. We're not going to settle that argument in a blog post. But we don't have to. Here's our rule for the feed: if something is hormonally active and we don't strictly need it, it doesn't go in. We already have a better omega-3 source. So flax has no job here. We're not trying to engineer a supplement. We're trying to feed a bird something close to what a bird ought to eat, and let your body do the rest. About the canola oil Somebody's going to ask, so let me get out in front of it. Yes, there's canola oil in the ration. It's organically grown, and it's a small piece of the overall feed. Birds need some fat. They need energy. The question is which fat. Canola runs roughly half the polyunsaturated fat of soybean oil and carries a much better omega 6 to 3 balance. At our scale, it's the best option on the table right now. If a better option shows up, we'll change with it. And we'll tell you when we do. What this actually means for your family You already read labels. You already ask the questions most people never think to ask. You've probably had that moment where you find something that looks clean, dig one layer deeper, and find out it wasn't. That's an exhausting way to feed a family, and most people around you have no idea you're doing it. This is us digging that layer for you, before you have to ask. No GMOs. No glyphosate. Nothing in the feed for a sensitive kid to react to. No added phytoestrogens. And a fat profile we're proud of. Same birds. Same pasture. Same families raising them. Just better feed. Y'all asked for this for a long time. Thanks for pushing.